Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a468b093f8974628

Jump to content

Talk:Charlotte York

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Gnomingstuff in topic Likely AI-generated content

Article Created

[edit]

I created this article for the reason that I thought in a show as well-known as this one, each of the four central characters should have their own page. I noticed that Charlotte York was the only one of the four that did not have her OWN article, and thus, I saw this as a job to be done. Please add any and all accurate content you may have in relation to the topic. Thank you.EnglishEfternamntalkcontribs 18:58, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

nice ^___^ Kenysgarage (talk) 10:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


You did well, I agree with you Zisimos 11:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


Isnt the director of Sex and the City called Charlotte Mcdougle, which may be why Trey's last name is Mcdougle. May be worth noting in a triva section —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.186.96 (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Should't this article make it clear if she is a main character in the show? Which it doesn't! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.91.26.234 (talk) 00:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Likely AI-generated content

[edit]

Hi - I added the AI generated tag here in reference to the edits by Thefallguy2025; here and elsewhere, they display many indicators of potential LLM output (some of their past edits have kept the chatgpt parameter in the refs), and since that text remains in the current version, it all needs review for sourcing, tone, accuracy/hallucinations, etc. (This applies even to changes that are "just" copy edits, as AI copy edits commonly introduce editorializing, subtle factual errors, unattributed opinion, non-neutral language, etc., even when they claim otherwise.) Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply