Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24899cb2de03191

Jump to content

Talk:Charles Edward Stuart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Coldupnorth in topic POV
Former featured article candidateCharles Edward Stuart is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleCharles Edward Stuart has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 17, 2022Good article nomineeListed
September 17, 2024Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article


Untitled

[edit]

The current article says in part: "In 1743, Charles fought at the Battle of Dettingen, where the British army was led by his chief rival, King George II".

I can find no evidence for Charles fighting at Dettingen in any of the major biographies. There is a chapter entitled "Dettingen" in G.A. Henty's book "Bonnie Prince Charlie" - but this book is not really about Charles Edward Stuart. Noel S McFerran 00:37, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The article said that the Battle of Culloden occurred in January 1746. As every source I have ever read indicated that Culloden's date was 15-16 April 1746, I changed this date. However, since I was rather confused by such a discrepancy in what seems to be an otherwise accurate article, I thought to post here to explain this change. echomikeromeo 00:49, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The date formerly given for the Battle of Culloden was actually the date for the Battle of Falkirk (at which Charles Edward was victorious). Noel S McFerran 02:03, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

I see. --echomikeromeo 00:57, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

After Culloden

[edit]

Can anyone elaborate why he did not continue the rising after his men regrouped at Ruthven after Culloden? Why did he feel himself betrayed and why did this lead him to flee? It is an important yet a point not deeply explored by the looks of it.


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

POV

[edit]

'In popular memory, he is known as Bonnie Prince Charlie'

In whose 'popular memory'? The memory of which 'people'? This is a distinctly partisan Jacobite fan name. Not everyone was or is a Jacobite. In the memory of his opponents (Williamites, Whigs, most English and probably most Lowland Scottish people), he clearly wasn't considered 'bonnie'. To his opponents, he was 'the Young Pretender'. In more recent Scottish nationalism, Jacobitism is (mis)appropriated as an early ancestor, leading to the adoption of such terms by Scottish national romantics, but not everyone in Great Britain is Scottish and not even every Scot is a Scottish nationalist. A more adequate phrasing would then be something like 'In popular Scottish nationalist memory'. This seems like a push for Jacobite hegemony over British historical memory in general. 62.73.72.101 (talk) 22:59, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Changed to the neutral text 'he has also been referred to as Bonnie Prince Charlie'. Coldupnorth (talk) 07:04, 20 August 2025 (UTC)Reply