Talk:Character race

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Churlew, Matthew (2006). ""Masters of the Wild": Animals and the Environment in Dungeons & Dragons" (PDF). Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies. 32 (1): 135–168. Retrieved 2026-03-16.

Hi there, I have a few editing suggestions - you may use them or not as you like :)

History -

"...game makes a difference between:" should be "... game differentiates between"

Generic races -

"TSR Hobbies assumed anyone buying D&D knew what Hobbits are" should be "TSR Hobbies assumed anyone buying D&D knew what Hobbits were" (perhaps, Im not surer on the how 'were' works as plural for multiple people (or multiple hobbits in this case)

there are one or two other things like this - I can list them here for you to consider, or if you prefer I can go straight in and change them?

the whole premise of this article is flawed

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There are some problems with the whole premise of this article, not just the contents of it.

1. the concept of "character" implies a player or main character, whereas a hypothetical fantasy/scifi "race" could exist without an instance of a character of that "race"

we could narrow the scope of the article, such as to D&D specific character race, where "character" (as well as "race") is more clearly defined. It would also match the related article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_class_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons) better

2. how is "character race" substantially different from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythic_humanoids or "fictional species" as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_fictional_species (or more specifically https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_fictional_humanoid_species)?

one could argue that the intent of this article is more along the lines of "fictional (humanoid) species" than "character race"

3. the article starts off saying it applies to both "fantasy and science fiction", but proceeds to primarily only discuss D&D and JRR Tolkien as sources, so really this is just about fantasy race

This article is either too broad or not broad enough. Slauhale (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Character race

the whole premise of this article is flawed