Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Under "Spelling", second paragraph: "in his 1992 paper on the subject, also emended the name to the "correct" spelling of Chaoyangsaurus (note the extra letter "o")." ...Extra compared to what? I see only one name presented anywhere in the article, spelled just as shown here. If you're going to reference another name like this, it should be shown. ...Looking through the history, I find previous versions showing the names "Chaoyoungosaurus", and "Chaoyangosaurus". It seems the three spellings were originally displayed, and the difference discussed. Then someone came along and changed all the spellings to the same, making the whole discussion incomprehensible. Why would someone do this? Perhaps someone actually familiar with the subject could repair the damage?
