Talk:Chacha language

Requested move 2 July 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 07:25, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

---

Chachapoya language → Chacha language – The language is not called Chachapoya in any source I have access to. This name is undocumented in the literature. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 01:18, 1 July 2026 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). 162 etc. (talk) 05:42, 2 July 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:45, 9 July 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 02:29, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• @Kepler-1229b It would probably be best if you enlightened us with sources every time you make a TR, because we have no idea what sources you have access to or what sources you're talking about. Could you do that, please? CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 08:46, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Thilio All sources in the article, plus Urban, Matthias (2024-12-31), Urban, Matthias (ed.), "Small and extinct languages of Northern Peru", The Oxford Guide to the Languages of the Central Andes (1 ed.), Oxford University PressOxford, pp. 419–437, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198849926.003.0014, ISBN 978-0-19-884992-6, retrieved 2026-07-01{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)</ref>. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 17:43, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Seconded; this user habitually makes requests here at WP:RMT which are neither technical nor uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 21:07, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

@162 etc. It seems you haven't checked my recent edit history; I haven't made many requests here in the last few months until today. Furthermore, all the sources I can access explicitly use the new title to be moved with and not the current one, so this particular move is not controversial. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:35, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Support per findings of nom. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:21, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.