Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a240f9a759a0c235

Jump to content

Talk:Chaabou

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by AsceticRose in topic Deletion requested

no citations at all

[edit]

So, no citations at all, and it seems everything from this page is from a single user named "Maxq 2006". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.26.90.194 (talk) 16:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deletion requested

[edit]

This article is full of baseless speculation with no sources. It reads like the ramblings of an anti-Muslim with little intelligence and knowledge. It should be deleted, as it has no place on an encyclopedia. SOW93 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree, it mention false information about Islam.--Ashashyou (talk) 23:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
AsceticRose, should we pass this article through AfD? --Fauzan✆ talk✉ mail 13:43, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi Fauzan, I think, this page should be deleted. A Google search only showed Chaabou to be persons' name, and not what this article claims. In my view, it fails to meet notability , verifiability, reliable sources. Can you arrange for the deletion process? -AsceticRosé 16:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
AsceticRose, I have WP:PRODded it. --Fauzan✆ talk✉ mail 16:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Searching for chaabou goddess does turn up a few things, though. Also one of the cited ref mentions chaabou in a footnote, as I had checked it few months ago. Any way, atleast not notable. --Fauzan✆ talk✉ mail 16:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also, it is not clear what was actually being said in that footnote, but it is clear that the provided ref does not actually discuss about the said chaabou. It seems the ref has been misused by the article creator. -AsceticRosé 17:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply