Talk:ChEMBL
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Speedyboy in topic Scope section could be more informative
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ChEMBL article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scope section could be more informative
[edit]The Scope section doesn't mention the criteria for inclusion of a compound in ChEMBL. I don't know what they are or I would add them. Can someone from the ChEMBL team clarify how a compound makes it into the database? And what compounds are excluded?
For example, does ChEMBL aspire to include all approved drugs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedyboy (talk • contribs) 15:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Molecular Biology articles
- Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles
- Start-Class Computational Biology articles
- Mid-importance Computational Biology articles
- WikiProject Computational Biology articles
- All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
- Start-Class Book articles
- Reference works task force articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- Start-Class Chemistry articles
- Low-importance Chemistry articles
- WikiProject Chemistry articles

