Talk:Certainty effect

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bad example

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What in gods name does that example show? In the first question, option A is technically the better choice. In the second question, option B is technically the better choice. The questions aren't very relatable at all. In any case, it certainly doesn't help demonstrate the Certainty Effect. I think it should be removed. 24.130.212.167 (talk) 04:21, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

"It is an idea introduced in prospect theory. " Is it, though? It was already discovered 30 years prior by Maurice Allais - Allais paradox — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.66.121.1 (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Certainty effect

Bad example