Talk:Ceres Power
Add topicLatest comment: 10 months ago by Dormskirk in topic Updates to page September 2025 by connected contributor
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled (pre-April 2024)
[edit]Hi Logicman, I hope you are well, just wondering if you could change the title of this page to Ceres Power with no logician before? Sorry I am a bit of a perfectionist. Let me know, I look forward to hearing from you.
Proposed merge of Draft:Ceres Power into Ceres Power
[edit]Draft and article overlap and should be compared and combined. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:54, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Now done. Hallucegenia (talk) 07:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 | The content of Draft:Ceres Power was merged into Ceres Power on 2023-07-15. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Updates to page September 2025 by connected contributor
[edit]Hi, I was unaware of the rules surrounding edits to wikipedia pages and connected contributors.
Can the edits I have made to update the page to be current/accurate (History, Awards, Business Model) be checked for neutrality/accuracy?
I will ensure that any future edits are proposed via the talk page here.
Thank you Frankie.conynghamceres (talk) 12:43, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
- Please see WP:RS "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources"; company press releases are not independent. Also wikipedia should not be used for promotional purposes: please see WP:PROMO. Dormskirk (talk) 13:21, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Dormskirk, thank you, understood - how is best to go about ensuring the article is factually correct with fullsome details? Are published reports (e.g. annual reports) or regulatory news considered factually published sources given it being a publicly listed company? Many thanks for your help. Frankie.conynghamceres (talk) 09:55, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- Additional information needs to be notable i.e. not routine material on contracts won etc. The sources need to be secondary, published and independent i.e. books and newspaper articles, rather than press releases, RNS material etc. Dormskirk (talk) 10:01, 24 September 2025 (UTC)