Talk:Cephaloleia perplexa
Add topicLatest comment: 10 months ago by Loopy30 in topic Feedback from New Page Review process
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Given category "Beetles described in 1885", this should be mentioned with a reference in the article text. Otherwise looks good!
Zzz plant (talk) 13:42, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree, the year and authority of the original description is already present in the taxobox, and several links to verify this can be now found in the taxonbar at the bottom of the article. To add this to the text without any further detail would only be redundant. Loopy30 (talk) 13:59, 6 September 2025 (UTC)