Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22c68c2feb297fe

Jump to content

Talk:Centric relation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Mtj2109

As I am sure you know, the definition of Centric Relation as regards a verifiable and repeatable condylar position within the glenoid fossa has been a source of some considerable debate. I am curious as to how you regard the definition of Centric Relation as presented by Dr. Peter Dawson in his works, including his latest Functional Occlusion: From TMJ to Smile Design eliminating the term "posterior". I am relatively new to the study of occlusion, and I am interested in thoughts regarding Dr. Dawson, the Las Vegas Institute, and others with whom I am not yet familiar. Thank you.

Centric relation is no longer considered as the position of the condyle in the most posterior-superior postion in the glenoid fossa. This was the definition of CR before 1987 but since has been updated. The current Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms defines CR as " a maxillomandibular relationship in which the condyles articulate with the thinnest avascular portion of their respective disks with the complex in the anterior-superior position against the slopes of the articular eminences." Mtj2109 (talk) 17:40, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply