Talk:Cenad
Add topicLatest comment: 10 months ago by Demetrios1993 in topic Alternative names
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
pronunciation
[edit]Romanian pronunciation [tʃɛˈnad] Readder (talk) 10:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Alternative names
[edit]Hey user:Demetrios1993, I guess you haven't seen this article. I wanted to kindly remind you. It has so many names already, but I am sure you will remove all with ease! Good luck. Keleci (talk) 07:39, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Keleci: No, I haven't seen this article, nor do I care for it in order to spare my limited time and improve it. There are a myriad other articles that have similar issues. I have repeatedly forwarded you to the relevant guideline—MOS:ALTNAME—which you apparently still either haven't read, understood, or accepted. It is obvious that in this case the lead paragraph suffers from serious and unnecessary cluttering, requiring the movement of the alternative names to a new § Names section. – Demetrios1993 (talk) 12:06, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- The edit I made is totally in line with the MOS:ALTNAME, you don't seem to understand the manual you are citing. It literally says the opposite of what you've understood. I kindly suggest you to read the manual again and undo your unnecessary and against-the-MOS revert. Keleci (talk) 10:41, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
- No, it isn't in line with it, and there is no consensus for it. I am not the one who mistook direct quotations from the guidelines as supposed interpretations of mine. – Demetrios1993 (talk) 20:29, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
- The edit I made is totally in line with the MOS:ALTNAME, you don't seem to understand the manual you are citing. It literally says the opposite of what you've understood. I kindly suggest you to read the manual again and undo your unnecessary and against-the-MOS revert. Keleci (talk) 10:41, 9 September 2025 (UTC)