Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2362edb2aafdafe

Jump to content

Talk:Catholic imagination

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Taram in topic Helpful but needs citations

}}

Wikifying this article

[edit]

As part of the wikification drive, I will Wikify this article. ProfessorPaul 19:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


Thank you very much, a very interesting topic indeed! -Aaron L. Philippines

Holy Spirit

[edit]

I think that the apparent contrast in Catholic and Protestant imaginations has to do with possible differences in pneumatology or theology of the Holy Spirit, and this should likely be noted. In Catholic theology, for instance, the Holy Spirit is ever-present in the embryo and fetus, and he is also very present in marriage, society and liturgy, while Protestant theology is much less clear about the social role of the Holy Spirit. There is a seemingly a similar contrast with Jews and Moslems, who have different imaginations about the relationship between spirituality and society. ADM (talk) 12:26, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Characteristics of imagination.

[edit]

Human ‘self’ and the memory in which the ‘self’ remains in dynamic state, are located in the immaterial space time. The observed unit is located in an interval of standing time ‘now’ and it is a static picture, or an idea. The ‘self’ is motivated by the ‘emotional energy’ arising from the difference between two parts of the static unit observed in the ‘now’. The motivation allows the ‘self’ to change the picture in the next ‘now’. Change from one now to the next ‘now’ manifests flowing time. KK (83.27.128.181 (talk) 19:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC))Reply

Helpful but needs citations

[edit]

This is a very helpful article to use as a jumping off point for further research; however, a number of the quotes (especially in the beginning) are not cited which thwarts any research efforts. If anybody knows where some of these quotes were derived form, please cite them. Thank you! Taram (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply