Talk:Category 2 cable
Add topicLatest comment: 16 years ago by Kvng in topic Requested move
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
[edit]Category 2 cable → Level 2 cable — Category 2 cable is not a the correct term. The correct term is level 2 cable and I think it is Important use the correct term. — Crazz bug 5 (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Oppose - The single cited reference indicates, contrary to the article text, that Cat 2 is a legit term. The UTP Cable Standards template also seems to consider Cat 2 to be a legit term. --Kvng (talk) 14:36, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
Categories:
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class Computer networking articles
- Low-importance Computer networking articles
- Start-Class Computer networking articles of Low-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Telecommunications articles
- Low-importance Telecommunications articles