Talk:Casa
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Jacksonvil in topic Requested move 9 March 2026
| This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| On 9 March 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from CASA to Casa. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 9 March 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Feel free to start a new discussion below. (non-admin closure) Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 08:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
CASA → Casa – Per WP:DABNAME, a word is preferred over an abbreviation. GilaMonster536 (talk) 20:28, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Support as per nom. 162 etc. (talk) 21:34, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom. मल्ल (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 01:43, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Support Rreagan007 (talk) 18:02, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Instead of pondering this sort of a style matter, I think this would be a good time to instead split the two groups of meanings into their own lists under separate titles, because the combined list is very long already and can't be particularly efficient. WikiNav view of clickstreams shows the three identifiable click destinations are all for the uppercase version. Giving those readers a shorter list to wade through might improve navigation outcomes. --Joy (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- Disambiguation pages aren't usually split up in that way. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:14, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- I'd love to hear a positive argument why this shouldn't be done in this case, as opposed to just an appeal to tradition. --Joy (talk) 19:40, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.