Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23b2b51ec624f87

Jump to content

Talk:Casa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Jacksonvil in topic Requested move 9 March 2026

Requested move 9 March 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Feel free to start a new discussion below. (non-admin closure) Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 08:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply


CASACasa – Per WP:DABNAME, a word is preferred over an abbreviation. GilaMonster536 (talk) 20:28, 9 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom. मल्ल (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Instead of pondering this sort of a style matter, I think this would be a good time to instead split the two groups of meanings into their own lists under separate titles, because the combined list is very long already and can't be particularly efficient. WikiNav view of clickstreams shows the three identifiable click destinations are all for the uppercase version. Giving those readers a shorter list to wade through might improve navigation outcomes. --Joy (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Disambiguation pages aren't usually split up in that way. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:14, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'd love to hear a positive argument why this shouldn't be done in this case, as opposed to just an appeal to tradition. --Joy (talk) 19:40, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.