Talk:Cartesian skyscraper
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Unreferenced articles | |||
| ||||
Highly amusing.
[edit]"This article looks like an automatic or simply very translation". Might I suggest that so too does this? And it also purports to be a template, which, from the look of the code, it is not. Is this meant to be a template? Does this template exist? If so does it contain the same (possibly self-referential) amusing grammatical mistake? Jameshfisher 19:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- Ha-ha. Very clever. But why didn't you fix the article? Shit happens. It was my manual intervention. I didn't find a good template for this kind of amusing texts. `'mikka (t) 22:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Reference cleanup
[edit]While adding additional references to the article, I noticed that the origianl reference cited is a dead link. Does anyone have updated information, or should we remove the citation?? Tcxspears (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2013 (UTC)