Talk:Cartesian circle

Philosophy: Logic / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Modern philosophy

Why "non-primary sources needed"?

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm removing two instances of "non-primary source needed" that appear with direct quotations of Descarte's replies to the the Circle objection. In the primary source, Descartes is explicitly stating that he is responding to the objection. This does not appear to involve any original research and I think it should not require a secondary source.Nomadx (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contribution to this article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oludara Orederu (talk • contribs) 22:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Cartesian circle

Why "non-primary sources needed"?