Talk:Carry Somers

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Carry Somers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305105624/http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/pdf/newsletter/newsletter_09_3.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/pdf/newsletter/newsletter_09_3.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131106104614/http://www.geofairtrade.eu:80/ to http://www.geofairtrade.eu/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.acblack.com/Catalogue/details.asp?sku=1424509&dept%5Fid=16
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150712161903/http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/article/TMG9941053/Livia-Firth-brings-glamour-to-Sustainable-City-Awards.html to http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/article/TMG9941053/Livia-Firth-brings-glamour-to-Sustainable-City-Awards.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Reads like an advert

Content like "campaigning for systemic reform of the fashion industry with a focus on the need for greater supply chain transparency", "Fashion Revolution works all year round to highlight the need for greater transparency in fashion supply chains"' is purely promotional. Theroadislong (talk) 15:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Maintenance tags

I have a connection to the subject of this article and am mindful of Wikipedia’s conflict of interest guidance.

Over recent edits, I have worked to address the maintenance concerns raised by the

and

tags. Changes include reducing résumé-style lists; consolidating sections (media, lectures, awards); removing promotional or frequency-based language; trimming company-specific detail; and simplifying sourcing in line with WP:NPOV and WP:NOTCV.

I would welcome review by an uninvolved editor to assess whether the article now meets encyclopaedic tone and whether the maintenance tags remain necessary. Ecochic (talk) 22:41, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Edits reverted

My recent edits were reverted. Please advise reason. Wikifashionedits (talk) 00:41, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Stop using AI. That's the reason. Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:52, 15 May 2026 (UTC)