Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a269aad43e73122e

Jump to content

Talk:Carcinus maenas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCarcinus maenas has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 10, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 13, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Untitled

[edit]

We propose to add a section titled "Non Indigenous Range" and to add information to the "Ecology" and "C. maenas as an invasive species" section.--PBG250 00:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply


I have a question: In areas where they are particularly bad, why has nobody thought to try to fish them as food (soft shelled?) They may not be very big, but as they are indeed reproducing like rabbits I think a large pot full of them could compensate....


Reference 6

[edit]

The reference doesn't match up to the link... (Sorry if this isn't the right way to post this!) PJFraser (talk) 16:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for pointing it out – now fixed! --Stemonitis (talk) 16:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Carcinus maenas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Carcinus maenas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

The picture

[edit]

Is it just me or is it missing a leg?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.232.26 (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions new categories: predation, reproduction, invasive vs native affects. ==

[edit]

Some categories that could be expanded upon or included in this article include predation, reproduction, native vs invasive range behaviors. The article outlines the green crab’s prey but does not go into specifics as to how the crabs locate, hunt, or consume the prey by opening shells, cracking shells or another method. By exploring the methods of predation, it could show in more depth how they affect their prey species in native and invasive ranges. Additionally, the mating mechanisms and reproductive strategy of the parents is not included. There is a section that talks about the number of eggs the crabs have but limited information regarding mate selection or mating events. There is a large focus on the article of the crab’s impact in their invasive regions, how does their behavior and strategies differ in their native and invasive ranges? How does their prey compare in their different regions? The comparison between native and invasive ranges in terms of conditions, prey, and control is scattered throughout but the consolidation could more clearly articulate the impact the crab's are having. Additionally, their new prey may be dependent on the area they are in, as they are invasive in many different environments globally each one is likely to be different. SemiProCleric19 (talk) 21:32, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

SemiProCleric19 (talk) 21:32, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply