Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22e54a50b3ccf3b

Jump to content

Talk:Candy Darling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by MikeLeighAtTheBBC in topic Photo choice rationale?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Se7enjoints.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Encyclopedia entry

[edit]

After watching the documentary: "Beautiful Darling", I was curious about the subject. Where is Darling's original name in the lede, infobox or article: James Lawrence Slattery? Maineartists (talk) 03:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia forbids publication of birth names of transsexuals. Seems weird to me, but that' the rules: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Biography#Including_dead_names  Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.70.86.190 (talk) 09:26, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Talk pages aren't "rules". MOS:GENDERID summarizes Wikipedia's current guidelines for writing about transgender individuals. —98.113.213.130 (talk) 02:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well, the Christine Jorgensen bio includes her birth name, so it seems WP is not applying MOS:DEADNAME consistently. Muzilon (talk) 03:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rollback

[edit]

@Materialscientist: This was rolledback w/o explanation. Gonna assume only a misfire with Huggle – rather than misuse; as this edit actually fixes failed verification; and this one is nonsense (very likely ax-grinding to boot). If there's an issue with the infobox, it can be discussed. 2601:701:201:450:851C:11D3:7129:5609 (talk) 11:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Trans, transgender, or transsexual

[edit]

This is the place for the slow-motion edit warring editors to have their conversation, not in the edit comments. Unless a discussion is had here and a consensus acheived, I will continue to revert changes to "transgender," as this is inclusive of "transseexual" and the subject is an icon of the broader transgender community, not just the transsexual subset, and full rather than abbreviated terms are preferred on Wikipedia. IP editors, take note please. Skyerise (talk) 19:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Since MOS:GIDINFO is silent on the issue and Candy never labelled herself, I'm deferring to the style guides for AP and GLAAD, both of which default to "transgender" unless requested by the individual. I've added an invisible comment in hopes of deterring future reversions. NuanceQueen (talk) 22:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Photo choice rationale?

[edit]

Can someone explain to me why Candy is pictured on her death bed? Is it just because of the notable photographer?

There's no shortage of photos of her in life, and in my nearly two decades on this site, I think this is the only biography I've seen where the sole photo of the person profiled is them dying. -- Zanimum (talk) 14:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Actually, without going about reviewing the criteria for fair use images again, I think they're allowed primarily for the identification of the topic covered. Only about a fifth to a quarter of this photograph aides in the identification of Candy. -- Zanimum (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

One final comment, I see that the image is the cover of I Am a Bird Now. But given that the image was taken roughly three decades before the album was released, I'm a little doubtful that it's any "more" fair use than any other image. Why not the poster of Beautiful Darling (2010)?

Essentially, notability was from life, not death, so it's jarring that the photo is of her death. -- Zanimum (talk) 14:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

She wasn't dead in this, very much staged, photograph. The actual problem is that the photo is a copyrighted work of noted photographer, Peter Hujar. MaximZero (talk) 03:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Is there an alternative picture we can use? --DanielRigal (talk) 23:54, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
There are some in this archive, they all say copyright undetermined. Maybe an editor in the US might be best placed to contact them to ask? Some here also. Does anyone know more about US copyright law for images made by people now deceased? Or images over 50 years old? And what fair use covers. MikeLeighAtTheBBC (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2025 (UTC)Reply