Talk:Campdrafting

Really minor style question

Hey, Cg, noticed the nice edits to this article. One comment, do with it as you will. "Formal recognition of Australian Stock Horses as a distinct breed ..." Sounds really like a clash of gears where it's at. I know the point you are after is that it's the most popular breed for the sport, etc., but it feels out of place in the middle of the history section, and comes across as if we put in something about the formation of the American Quarter Horse Association in the reining or cutting article -- Perhaps, rather than mixing it in with the history of the sport section, maybe create a new section titled something like "The Campdrafting Horse" and describe characteristics of a good horse, with a note that most common breed is the ASH, which was recognized as a distinct breed...etc... As a comparison, note Reining#The_horse as an example. I didn't want to go in and edit the article myself on this, just thought I'd bring it to your attention and you can do as you see fit. Good luck! Montanabw^(talk) 23:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Please feel free to edit. I will add a little on the EI effect later.Cgoodwin (talk) 06:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Campdrafting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090929095646/http://www.abcra.com.au/index.cfm?page_id=1003 to http://www.abcra.com.au/index.cfm?page_id=1003

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)