Talk:Camelopardalis

"Invented"?

How does somebody invent a constellation? RickK 08:32, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

"Created" is probably a better term. JYolkowski 22:02, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Or "newly designated" or "newly identified". ~~~~ 20:29, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

"Invented" seems better than "recorded" to me. The latter seems to imply (wrongly) that constellations are sitting there waiting to be discovered and named, like stars or planets! Gdr 19:17, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

They are! If planets and stars sit awaiting being discovered, then the constellations are too. Rursus 19:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Bah, we don't invent stars or planets. Locations of stars are of course natural, but star patterns are purely human inventions. Especially those which are created only to fill empty space between the older and more conspicuous patterns. Unless you'er one of those who believe that a piece of artwork already exist somewhere and the job of an artist is to discover it. ;)--JyriL ^talk 23:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Basically they see stars and they look like someone I have even found my own. like, A Harry Potter scar 50.106.91.66 (talk) 00:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Greek myth

The article says:

However, as a desert, together with other features in the Zodiac sign of Gemini (i.e. the Milky Way, and the constellations Gemini, Orion, Auriga, and Canis Major), this may be the origin of the myth of the cattle of Geryon, which forms one of The Twelve Labours of Herakles.

I'm intrigued. What's the evidence for this claim? Gdr 19:17, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Barfable visualisation

Those extremely ugly visualisations with lots of odd and sharp angles, besides being impossible to use in an amateur astronomer context (the only context when they are actually used), where does it come from? It's by all means certain that it is quite ahistoric, besides bugging me, and possibly also being laughable. Said: Rursus ☻ 20:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Mythology

Partially incorrect:

Camelopardalis has no mythology associated with its stars, as it is a modern constellation,

Hevelius associated it with the camel that Rebecka rode throught the desert to Isaac. Hevelius'es story is far fetched, since he assumes Camelopardalis is a camel, not a giraffe, but he is not that far from the desert/tent depiction that has been suggested being the Arabs depiction of the area of Camelopardalis. Said: Rursus (☻) 14:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I mean Jacob Bartsch. Said: Rursus (☻) 14:21, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Johannes Hevelius did not give it the official name

The sentence "Johannes Hevelius gave it the official name [...] because he saw the constellation's many faint stars as the spots of a giraffe." should probably be removed. I find no evidence in his original works that Hevelius compared its faint stars with the spots of a giraffe. The cited source, Staal's The New Patterns in the Sky (p. 241), does not provide a reference to which of Hevelius's works this claim is to be found in. Like other stories on the constellations in this popular book (such as on Hydrus) its supposed mythology appears to be Staal's own invention. AstroLynx (talk) 10:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Correct. Johannes Hevelius did not give it the official name. Petrus Plancius added the constellation when he designed the globe published in 1613 by Pieter van der Keere [Engraver & Printer]. His name is translated from the Latin which reads Petrus Kaerius Flander Caelavit et Excudit. The likely reason you cannot find evidence is because most books from the 18th century and earlier are written in Latin. Even in the early 19th century, books were still being published in Latin. Americanplus (talk) 04:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

I've been removing Staal's material and replacing it where possible with more scholarly material Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Voyager 1

Actually, Voyager 1 is not heading in the direction of the constellation Camelopardalis, as stated in the article, but in the direction of the constellation Ophiuchus. However, the star AC+793888, which is *now* in Camelopardalis, is flying in the direction of Ophiuchus, and Voyager 1 will pass this star at approx 1.6 light-year distance some 40,000 years from now. (source: https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/interstellar-mission/) --Govert Schilling — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.80.196.184 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Image from this article to appear as POTD soon

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Camelopardalis, Tarandus and Custos Messium.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on 7 December 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-12-07. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Picture of the day

Camelopardalis is a large but faint constellation of the northern sky. Introduced in 1612 or 1613 by Petrus Plancius, it represents a giraffe. The brightest stars in Camelopardalis are β Cam, a double star 1,000 light-years from Earth with apparent magnitude 4.03; CS Cam, a 4.21-magnitude variable star; and α Cam, a blue-hued supergiant star of magnitude 4.3. At 5,000 light-years from Earth, α Cam is one of the most distant stars easily visible with the naked eye. The constellation is located in the part of the celestial sphere facing away from the galactic plane, which means it has many distant galaxies visible within its borders. This includes the NGC 2403 galaxy in the M81 Group, located approximately 12 million light-years from Earth.

This illustration was produced in around 1823 and comes from Urania's Mirror, a set of 32 astronomical star chart cards. Above the giraffe are the now-abandoned constellations of Tarandus and Custos Messium.Lithograph: Sidney Hall. Restoration: Adam Cuerden.

Proposed image addition: NOIRLab annotated wide-field photograph of Camelopardalis

Hello, I am affiliated with NSF NOIRLab and would like to propose the following addition to the article for community review. This is an additive proposal — the existing naked-eye photograph (File:CamelopardalisCC.jpg) remains untouched in its current position. No existing content is removed or replaced.

• Proposed change: Add the NOIRLab annotated wide-field photograph of Camelopardalis as a new left-aligned thumbnail immediately above the existing naked-eye image in the "Features" section.
• Image: File:Camelopardalis (Annotated) (camelopardalis-ann).tiff
• Suggested caption: The constellation Camelopardalis showing the IAU boundaries, the constellation stick figure, and labels for its brightest stars. Astrophotograph by Eckhard Slawik, from NOIRLab's 88 Constellations project.
• Placement: "Features" section, left-aligned, directly above the existing right-aligned naked-eye photograph (File:CamelopardalisCC.jpg). The two images serve different reader needs: the existing photograph conveys the visual impression of the constellation as seen with the naked eye, while the annotated image provides an identification reference showing boundaries, stick figure, and labeled stars.
• Layout justification: The article has substantial prose in the "Features" section — multiple paragraphs covering stars and deep-sky objects — providing enough vertical text to accommodate two images without the visuals overwhelming or extending beyond the surrounding content.
• License: CC BY 4.0 (NOIRLab/NSF/AURA)

Here is the exact wikitext to insert at the top of the "Features" section, immediately before the existing [[Image:CamelopardalisCC.jpg|thumb|The constellation Camelopardalis as it can be seen by the naked eye.]] line:

The constellation Camelopardalis showing the IAU boundaries, the constellation stick figure, and labels for its brightest stars. Astrophotograph by Eckhard Slawik, from NOIRLab's 88 Constellations project.

I am happy to adjust the caption wording if reviewers prefer different phrasing. If the community prefers the external link in the caption to be formatted as a <ref> citation instead, I am glad to revise accordingly. If the community prefers the article as it currently stands, I will withdraw this proposal entirely. Thank you for your time. Marcodatadev (talk) 19:23, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Done DiscoursesonLivvy (talk · contribs) 05:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC)