Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a229b6a48915891a

Jump to content

Talk:Cambroraster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Zhenghecaris in topic Anatomy

Anatomy

[edit]

Junn11 reconstructed Cambroraster with dorsal setal blades but others don’t who’s right? Zhenghecaris (talk) 19:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The ROM lab has been of the opinion that radiodont setal blades are generally ventral, and they confirmed this is the case for at least Stanleycaris. Evidence from other formations indicates that setal blades are, more likely, generally dorsal. The degree of association with the flaps varies. For Cambroraster, it seems to me that the ROM team is probably correct to place them ventrally. The body is described as sub-triangular, more strongly convex ventrally. The setal blades follow this curve tightly. I think specimen ROMIP 65088 (Moysiuk and Caron, 2019, Supp. Fig 1a,b) shows this best. I think its difficult to reckon this fossil with a dorsal placement for the setal blades.
TL;DR the setal blades were probably ventral in Cambroraster. Prehistorica CM (talk) 05:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay. Zhenghecaris (talk) 15:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply