Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a916099cd8ae97

Jump to content

Talk:California State Route 67/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 03:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    In the history, you jump from 1970 back to 1968.
    Fixed. --Rschen7754 03:25, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • A little detail about the physical surroundings can be added to the route description.
    • "Funding was allocated for traffic signals on the portion between Main Street and Broadway in 1954", is this really that important to mention?
    • When did construction of the freeway begin?
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will put the article on hold for a few fixes to be made. Dough4872 03:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

All replied to. --Rschen7754 03:25, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
I will now pass the article. Dough4872 03:28, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply