Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22e532b7c36cf3b

Jump to content

Talk:California

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 days ago by A1Cafel in topic "Kalifoni" listed at Redirects for discussion
Former good article nomineeCalifornia was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 6, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
March 16, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
November 11, 2016Good article nomineeNot listed
March 4, 2022Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 7, 2004, September 9, 2007, September 9, 2008, September 9, 2009, and September 9, 2010.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Questionable Assertion about Men in Women's Clothing

[edit]

The section 'Indigenous' needs to change. In the start of the section, current understand of the demographics of native people says "greater than 300,000 people" in "more then 70 distinct ethnic groups". Yet the very next paragraph goes into detail with one theory of "men in women's clothing have traditional roles" and declares it to be "common". No one knows that those gender roles were "common" in California. This wording is directly misleading. It is not intellectually honest to put forward one particular theory as "common", without admitting the context or considering other theories, if not equally even in passing at all. Secondly, there were warrior tribes, and practices of slavery among some tribes. The implication is that the tribes really were diverse, including savage and cruel behavior associated with dominant hunter clans with territory. This portion of history is not mentioned at all. This section shows obvious bias, does not meet standards of fairness, accuracy and rigor.

GA

[edit]

Hello all!


I would be interested in getting this up to GA article status.


If anyone would like to help me, that would be much appreciated.


Thank you! In solidarity Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 20:43, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Cali." abbreviation: clarify informal status?

[edit]

I've removed the mention of "Cali." in the Etymology section as an abbreviation for California. There's no reason we can't mention it, but I do believe standard journalistic practice is to avoid this form; therefore, if someone decides to add it back, I'd argue they should also at least include clarification about its more informal reputation. Nicklaf (talk) 21:36, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Kalifòni" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Kalifòni has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 25 § Kalifòni until a consensus is reached. A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Kalifoni" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Kalifoni has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 25 § Kalifoni until a consensus is reached. A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply