Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24025edb8021ef0

Jump to content

Talk:Cal Clemens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by TarnishedPath in topic Did you know nomination
Good articleCal Clemens has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 27, 2025Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 10, 2025.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Cal Clemens "tackled like a sledge hammer"?

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Cal Clemens/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 19:49, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply


I'll review this. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:49, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]
  • I made a change to how his birthdate discrepancy is written, just fyi
  • By "two-way", are we talking about offense and defense? Could be made clearer and/or linked to two-way player
  • year, but thought that he comma isn't needed
  • and scoring another two himself "scored" instead of "scoring"
  • of the National Football League just "NFL" is fine
  • After one game, against the Boston Redskins,-->After a game against the Boston Redskins,
  • Link "defense" to Arms industry.
  • He battled cancer in his last years-->He was sick with cancer in his last years
  • So with his obituary clearly stating his age at his time of death, I think we can just remove all mention of 1913 or 1914, right? Just erroneous information at this point.
  • References:
    • All are reliable for what is being cited
    • All are consistently formatted
    • Spot checks: 2, 5, 9, 13, 20, 23

Nice work! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:33, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by TarnishedPath talk 11:44, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 413 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:10, 1 September 2025 (UTC).Reply

  • Article passed GA review on August 27 so its eligible under GA promotion as well as 5x expansion. QPQ has been done. No copyright violations or other policy compliance issues detected in the article. Hook length and facts check out to cited materials. I'll leave it to the promoter to decide which of the two they prefer.4meter4 (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply