Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24d29852902d434

Jump to content

Talk:Cachena

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Justlettersandnumbers in topic References

Name of breed

[edit]

This article it currently called Cachena Cattle, with a redirect to it from Cachena. It looks to me as if this is in fact a breed of cattle called the Cachena, with "cattle" not being part of the breed name – this is the normal arrangement in English, and is followed by almost all cattle breeds. The article should therefore be called Cachena, and the text corrected to match. Any other views? Richard New Forest (talk) 12:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alentejana Cattle which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. RM bot 21:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

World Encyclopedia

[edit]

I nearly called copyvio on this article until I noticed that the source for World Encyclopedia was WikiMedia. They copied us! Notice that the footnotes at the bottom look just like the ones found here except ours work.  Myk Streja [who?] 01:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Tone of article

[edit]

Did a cachena farmer write this text? It is full of praise for the breed, especially in the "Use" section. Needs more citations (i. e. how the cows are such good mothers). 88.8.239.229 (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, IP ediyor! – please see below. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

References

[edit]

I'm thinking of trying to do some work on this page – adding independent reliable sources, expanding the text, editing for neutral encyclopaedic tone and so on. If I were to do so I would change the reference format to the list-defined system – references defined in the reference section, not in the text – and to hand-written refs (without cite templates), both changes for the sake of clarity and simplicity. I'll probably do that in a day or two if no-one minds, but will of course leave well alone if there's any objection. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply