Talk:Cache inclusion policy
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
In "comparison" section (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cache_inclusion_policy&action=edit§ion=4) There appears to be an error: "the exclusive cache has more unique memory capacity, it uses more bandwidth since it suffers from a higher rate of filling of new blocks (equal to the rate of higher level cache's misses) as compared to NINE cache which is filled with a new block only when it suffers a miss"
This reasoning is incorrect -- an exclusive cache will have the lowest miss rate of all variants, because it has the most total capacity -- not all L1 misses result in a fill. Only L1 misses that also miss in L2 result in a fill. All other things being equal (IE same number of ways in all 3 cases), the exclusive will have the fewest cases where it misses in both L1 and L2, because miss rate depends _only_ on capacity when all other things are equal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanhalle (talk • contribs) 00:43, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Mistake in a definition?
[edit]"If all blocks in the higher level cache are also present in the lower level cache, then the lower level cache is said to be inclusive of the higher level cache."
This cannot be possibly true, as it would require L1 to be at least as big as L2.
Rather it should say "If all blocks in the lower level cache are also present in the higher level cache, ..."
Or in other words, if line is in L1, it is also in L2. Or in other words, there are no lines in L1 that are in L1 only, and not in L2.
Right? 81.6.34.169 (talk) 20:12, 3 June 2025 (UTC)