Talk:CIM Schema

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Does CIM-Schema have ontological semantics for types and relationships?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There seems to be a gap in the interoperability aspect of this--perhaps there are other conventions which provide this info. It would be great if someone knowledgeable about this specifications could write a bit about the attributes and their interactions. 2603:3016:1CEB:0:0:0:0:D276 (talk) 03:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:CIM Schema

Does CIM-Schema have ontological semantics for types and relationships?