Talk:CAN SLIM
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Advertisement?
[edit]This reads like an ad. "Has reportedly made hundreds of millions by consistently following the approach". Sure. And the 'reference' is to a marketing page by the guys selling these magical rules. This is unproven, unverified, pseudoscience nonsense and this wikipedia page is obviously written by people who make money selling it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.82.249.130 (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
To delete or not to delete
[edit]I am not sure if I am following proper etiquette (your post on my talk page suggested that if I disagreed to remove the 'dated prod' template from the article). I am not affiliated with Investor's Business Daily in any sense. However, if you can have value investing as an article and not consider it spam, than you can certainly have CAN SLIM. I did include the criticisms of value investors as part of the article, and cannot see any immediately apparent sources of bias that I may have subconsciously introduced. In fact, personally I prefer Buffett's strategy. However, I felt O'Neil's ideas were important enough to include for at least a sense of perspective.
CAN SLIM and value investing are two of the many strategies to stock market investments. William O'Neil may not have as many adherents as Warren Buffett, but his ideas are still important enough to be discussed on many many forums that his newspaper does not directly control. I must admit, my knowledge of the market is relatively limited compared to many of the users on here. I would love to have someone with more experience weigh in on this article. Chantoke 11:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Merge duplicates
[edit]WP has both CAN SLIM & CANSLIM. Anyone available is encouraged to merge them. Both with- and without-space versions are used; note O'Neil's preference--CAN SLIM®. —jisok 06:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
I've merged the articles onto this page and turned CANSLIM into a redirect. I'm pretty sure I didn't remove any vital info. Also, didn't see the need for a dozen references per letter, especially since it's summed up in the first link. Anyways, if anyone cares to double-check, the old information is under the history at the old page.Averyisland (talk) 14:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)