Talk:Byron Review
Add topic
.svg){kind=small}
This review has been on the front page of virtually every UK newspaper, on some for two days running. I cannot find another article about the Review; I have written this text myself so it's not a copyvio either. I have no idea why it's a candidate for speedy deletion. Tim (Xevious) (talk) 17:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- A quick glance at Google News seems to indicate that this is indeed notable. JACOPLANE • 2008-03-28 18:09
- Even more so if you look at Google UK News ... Obviously I can't remove the speedy tag from my own page, so I'd appreciate it if someone else would! Tim (Xevious) (talk) 18:32, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
This page proved helpful for a very quick deffinition of what exactly the Byron Review was. Following links to sources I then found a PDF of the review itself. Can we not simply link directly to a PDF of the report and cut out the middle man? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.151.79 (talk) 10:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Byron Review. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2008/03/27/afx4820357.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)