Talk:Bundi State
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by AlvaKedak in topic Flag
 | Rao Surtan Singh was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 6 January 2018 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| The content of History of Bundi was merged into Bundi State on 27 June 2019. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Proposed merge with History of Bundi
[edit]Covers the same topic Sitush (talk) 04:11, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nominator's rationale Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 04:35, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Flag
[edit]@AlvaKedak, This is not a fictional flag either, see:
- Lethbridge, Sir Roper (1985). Prominent Indians of Victorian Age: A Biographical Dictionary. Archives Rare Prints. p. 92.
Is a Chauhan (Hara) Rájput (Hindu), descended from Rao Deo Singh, son of Rao Bakht Singh Deoji, who founded the State of Bundi about the year. The flag of the family is coloured yellow , with the motto Sri Rangesh Bhugi Bundesh Ram Singhe, meaning "Raja Ram Singh, ruler of Bundi, is a believer in Raghunathji."
Koshuri (グ) 11:33, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- But why is it that commons page of the flag does not cite this source? How is anyone supposed to know it is a sourced flag if the source is not provided? AlvaKedak (talk) 12:25, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Fictitional flags are tagged with this template on commons, Please don't remove flags just because you think they might be fictitious. Koshuri (グ) 13:07, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- That is an odd argument. You do know that the creators of those flags are not usually the ones tagging their files with that template, right? There are so many unsourced and fictitious flags in Wikimedia Commons that do not use this template despite the fact the some of them state in the summary of the page that it is just a proposed flag. The template is added by other editors because they don't want other editors to add it to Wikipedia articles.
- Like for example, this flag, the creator of the flag states that it is fictional, but did not add the template, I was the one who added that template because some editors kept using it in their articles.
- It is the responsibility of the creator of a flag to cite their sources. They are fictional until proven otherwise. You seem to have sources for many of these flags, so how about you add the citations in their commons pages so that this situation is not repeated once more. AlvaKedak (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Fictitional flags are tagged with this template on commons, Please don't remove flags just because you think they might be fictitious. Koshuri (グ) 13:07, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
