Talk:Bulsae-4

Incorrect assertion of designation

Missile in question is not designated Bulsae-4 as such is for reengineered Bulsae-2 that implemented rear aspect laser beam riding SACLOS and Bulsae-4M is modernization that has modernized launching post with miniaturized components. Also it is not Bulsae-5 as that is designation for 9M133 or clone of 9M133. CybermancySFRY (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Agreed, the article is based on a false designation used by some bloggers and then repeated elsewhere. --EndlessUnknown (talk) 12:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Requested move 9 August 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Thanks! —1isall (talk | contribs) 14:33, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

---

Bulsae-4 → ? – As previously mentioned, the designation Bulsae-4 is proven to belong to an improved version of the 9M111 missile/9K111 launcher. If no better designation is found, simply renaming it M-2018 might be an alternative EndlessUnknown (talk) 12:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks! —1isall (talk | contribs) 12:46, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.