Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a250076e0ed9c6f8

Jump to content

Talk:Bug-A-Salt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Quisqualis in topic COI edit request

COI edit request

[edit]

I'd like to propose a major edit to the Bug-A-Salt page. Below is my proposed edit:

 Preceding unsigned comment added by Tayloreyelash (talkcontribs) 01:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Willbb234: I'm notifying you so I can have your assistance with getting this new information on the page. I want to learn and make sure I'm making this major edit correctly. Please let me know what my next steps should be. Tayloreyelash (talk) 01:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Tayloreyelash: I’ve added a COI request at the top, so someone should help soon. From a first read, it looks good but the second paragraph is unreferenced and there are no references for any of the product descriptions - I recommend you remove these. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 06:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Not only that, but I have serious concerns about the tone of the text. This would be great at a company website about the product; however, it feels too promotional in tone for a neutral encyclopedia article. I also agree that major claims in the article need to cite independent reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 13:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
I agree that the tone is far too promotional. Some of the information offered is interesting and potentially useful, but it is worded in a way that is relentlessly sales-oriented. It is very important to find third-party references that are not themselves promotional platforms. Reify-tech (talk) 17:02, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Willbb234, C.Fred, and Reify-tech: I added an additional citation in the second paragraph. When the article was written, we tried to re-write it using language and information from the cited sources, so if it's possible could you please make edits or let me know how to better work the statements so they are more neutral? I looked at the Nerf page and I see that they have products on there and they did cite the Hasbro website as a reference for a product. Would this be a possibility? Could I cite the Bug-A-Salt website at all? Or the re-sellers of the product? I originally thought this was against Wikipedia: editing policy, but maybe it is possible? I added a new reference to the price in the second paragraph under the "Company" section. Would love more assistance with fixing the edit and I appreciate all your help! Tayloreyelash (talk) 18:57, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

It appears that you are under the impression that Wikipedia is a cost-effective form of promotion for your product. In fact, encyclopedia articles are intended to be concise, rather than an exhaustive account of a subject. You are, in my opinion, expecting far too much marketing help from a simple, general encyclopedia. Use social media instead.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)Reply