Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a230f82cfe35cf66

Jump to content

Talk:Buckwheat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by ~2026-17275-51 in topic Buckwheat as a threat

Buckwheat as a threat

[edit]

I was reverted with the edit summary "sorry but that is grossly undue for the lead: article concerns a species, a crop, its cuisine ... US opinion is a minor aspect of a sub-aspect, not lead material"

I seriously question the neutrality of calling it "grossly undue" to accurately report that because buckwheat is a serious allergen it absolutely cannot be tolerated by crop growers in the US. Calling it "opinion" is borderline insulting. Further more, dismissing the US viewpoint on English Wikipedia, is... something.

I request someone else than User:Chiswick Chap to review this. Since Chiswick Chap has recently nominated this page as a Good Article, it is especially important for them to take a step back in order to avoid suspicions of gatekeeping and article ownership sentiments. ~2026-17275-51 (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

  • Sure, keep calm, let's see what folks have to say. The immediate point was that the material (on "economic threat") was not a principal focus of the article, so it should not have gone in the lead. As for "opinion", it's what you wrote: the text you inserted actually said "local varieties ... are considered", i.e. some people's opinion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:01, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Wikipedia is a worldwide encyclopedia for the English language. Although I live in the US, I think that unless buckwheat is a similar problem for grain growers elsewhere in the world that particular wording is not appropriate for the lede and I agree with Chiswick Chap's reverting of the edit. If there are sources that show this is also an issue in other major grain growing areas such as Australia, Argentina, etc, then it should go in the lede. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 18:36, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • I find it strange to discuss an unreferenced addition. If we had significant reliable sources, we coud have added it somewhere in the body. --Altenmann >talk 22:17, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Look to the body of the article for sources. Lead sections are often intentionally kept source-free. ~2026-17275-51 (talk) 08:44, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply