Talk:Brussels II
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Shaio in topic Regulation repealed and replaced
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that an image or photograph of Brussels, a courthouse, or officials who sponsored this be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Untitled
[edit]Right now there is a review of the existing Brussels IIa (EC2201/2003) regulation. But it seems to be very intransparent. See e.g this FOI request: Brussels IIa (EC2201/2003) review - 28 Reports from 'each and every' memberstate for overall study
Regulation repealed and replaced
[edit]This instrument was replaced by a newer generation of the regulation in 2019. The old version is not in force anymore. Shaio (talk) 10:12, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Belgium-related articles
- Unknown-importance Belgium-related articles
- All WikiProject Belgium pages
- Start-Class European Union articles
- Unknown-importance European Union articles
- WikiProject European Union articles
- Wikipedia requested images
