Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22c82d5fc0ea8fe

Jump to content

Talk:Brunor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by ~2026-31329-76 in topic Gawain defending la Cote Male Taile

Gawain defending la Cote Male Taile

[edit]

Hello, I just wish to highlight something about the section regarding Malory's depiction of La Cote Male Taile that confuses me; in the article, it says that the knight that speaks on Brunor's behalf is Sir Gawain, but in every version of Le Morte d'Arthur that I've been able to find, it is Sir Lamorak and Sir Gaheris that do this;

"Sir, said Sir Lamorak and Sir Gaheris, it were well done to make him knight; for him beseemeth well of person and of countenance, that he shall prove a good man, and a good knight, and a mighty" https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Le_Morte_d%27Arthur/Volume_I/Book_IX/Chapter_I

Is there simply a version of Malory's take on this tale that I'm simply not aware of?, or could the one who originally wrote this perhaps have conflated Gaheris with his more well known brother, and forget Lamorak alltogether? The fact that the entire description of the tale is also without source worries me as well. ~2026-31329-76 (talk) 19:38, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply