Talk:Brooke Amendment
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Djfiedler. Peer reviewers: Chermsmeyer.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Brooke Amendment notes/brainstorm[edit | edit source]
[edit]Hi wiki world, let's get this page going. Below are my preliminary research and notes. I found resources in the UC Davis database collections and google.
Bibliography:
[edit]- Wood, Carol Schwetschenau, "Section1983 and the Brooke amendment to the 1937 Housing Act"
- Pinkston, Loretta L. "The Brooke Amendment: does 'shall pay as rent' give tenants a right to sue?"
- Schill, Michael, "Distressed Public Housing: where do we go from here?"
- "Rights without Remedies: section 1983 enforcement of title iv-d of the social security act" University of Chicago Law Review
- https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_featd_article_092214.html
- https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=Legs_Chron_June2014.pdf
- http://www.legisworks.org/GPO/STATUTE-82-Pg476.pdf
- http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1700&context=law_urbanlaw
- https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.a0000107235 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djfiedler (talk • contribs) 03:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Highlights
[edit]Affordable housing = 25% of income
Questions to address and help add information
[edit]- How was this standard set?
- Who was against the passage?
- Was there public input?
- How did the implementation phase go?
- Is anyone looking at addressing this or modifying it?
- How could this be changed in the future, amended by Presidents? 35% vote in congress?
- Why was this change enacted?
- Was this part of a campaign promise or an effort to fix a large social problem? Chermsmeyer (talk) 17:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Critique:
[edit]Forbes.com "how senator brooke helped destroy public housing"
- Decreased funds for management => physical degridation. As tenant funds decreased, HUD subsidy ^^
- Work disincentive for the poor.
The atlantic "The power of public housing"
- public-housing authorities couldn't collect sufficient funds to maintain healthy living standards. Restating Goetz. Blames white flight, civil rights act 64.
- Drove working families out of the project
Other meaning of phrase
[edit]In the world of U.S. foreign assistance, "Brooke amendment" is commonly used to refer to a totally different law, sec. 7012 of the annual State / foreign operations / national security appropriations acts, which limits foreign assistance to countries in default on debt to the US government. Specifically, it states (this is the FY 2024 version):
LIMITATION ON ASSISTANCE TO COUNTRIES IN DEFAULT
SEC. 7012. No part of any appropriation provided under titles III through VI in this Act shall be used to furnish assistance to the government of any country which is in default during a period in excess of 1 calendar year in payment to the United States of principal or interest on any loan made to the government of such country by the United States pursuant to a program for which funds are appropriated under this Act unless the President determines, following consultation with the Committees on Appropriations, that assistance for such country is in the national interest of the United States. ~2026-31678-81 (talk) 19:02, 28 May 2026 (UTC)