Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2230135ed332407

Jump to content

Talk:British Rail Class EB1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Biscuittin in topic Merger proposal

Possible change to the title of this article

[edit]

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.

Merger proposal

[edit]

The pages for classes EB1 and EF1 contain almost exactly the same text and refer to almost identical locos. Is there any reason at all why they should be separate ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjhskj75 (talkcontribs) 14:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Technically speaking, the ten locos were built to the EF1 spec, and one was rebuilt to EB1 spec for banking purposes on the Worsborough Incline. The other nine were supposed to have been rebuilt too, but this did not occur; and the sole rebuild never actually took up the intended banking duties, but was used as a depot shunter at Ilford. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:34, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Agree with merge - some cleanup needed, and coverage in same place would help with this - eg British Rail Class EB1 states in infobox : 1 built but article states when nos. 3-12 were all classified EB1 - this is confusing. I am assuming that the merge results in a more understandable/consistent article - there is a case for separate articles - but not at the current level of content. (70% duplicated) 87.102.90.152 (talk) 23:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Merged. Biscuittin (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply