Talk:British Rail Class 730
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the British Rail Class 730 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"/2" must NOT be linked
[edit]The /2 of Class 350/2 must NOT be linked at all, because it just redirects you to the page, which I do not want to happen on my Wikipedia experience. Please stop placing the /2 in the 4 braces, only put it in the last 2 please. Thank you. Edgar Searle (talk) 08:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Edgar Searle: First, regarding your remark "I do not want to happen on my Wikipedia experience", see WP:OWN. Second, since Class 350/2 works just fine, WP:NOTBROKEN applies. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
5-Car Livery
[edit]The 5-Car units are for London Northwestern Railway and thus the image showing one in West Midlands Railway livery is inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.212.21 (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Good point - and do we really need diagrams with two extra cars? Enotayokel (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Clear template
[edit]@Redrose64 the reason I removed the template was because of how the page looked on larger screens - on the screen I use, that template pushed the references to underneath the infobox, resulting in a huge amount of empty space Danners430 (talk) 18:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly, that's the point. You get proper use of columns, using the page width efficiently; but without the
{{clear}}, the refs are compressed into the left-hand part of the page. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Aventra or Landmark Class?
[edit]WMT have confirmed in a tweet that they intend to call their 730s the Landmark Class… should this form the name for the whole article instead of Aventra, or should it remain as Aventra with Landmark Class being used in the operator/named units section instead? Danners430 (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Artist's impression
[edit]Hi, looks like the Artist's impression shows 4 windows in between doors when all units in real life seem to have 5. 86.7.193.28 (talk) 19:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Could 4 photos in a 2x2 layout be included in the infobox (exterior and interior of both 730/0 and 730/2)?
[edit]Could 4 photos in a 2x2 layout be included in the infobox (exterior and interior of both 730/0 and 730/2)?
I know this is not the norm, but I think it should be done in this case, with the 730/0 and 730/2 being so different.
Currently, the two infobox photos are 730/0 exterior and 730/2 interior, then the two "opposite" photos (730/2 exterior and 730/0 interior) are in the "Fleet details ---> Illustration" section. Anamyd (talk) 04:58, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Hyperlink on operators in fleet details and operators section?
[edit]Considering both operators go to the same page and LNWR is linked twice, what should happen with the hyperlinks on the fleet details section and the operators in the infobox.
For the operators in the infobox could something like
West Midlands Railway
London Northwestern Railway
(both part of West Midlands Trains)
I dont know what to actually do with the fleet details page unless they just aren't hyperlinked JamesTecho (talk) 16:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)