Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25b08dd7bedb965

Jump to content

Talk:Breton Chasseurs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Russ3Z in topic Ordnance or Ordinance?

B class review

[edit]

The introduction says that this unit became the modern 81st Line Infantry. Please add a sentence about this at the end of the article and cite it. I imagine the source would be Grémillet. (Where did you find a copy of Susane? I'm impressed!) Djmaschek (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please use this format when writing the narrative: "The unit had 1 major, 1 adjutant, 1 surgeon." Please do not do this: "The unit had 1 x major, 1 x adjutant, 1 x surgeon." There are a few situations where it might be acceptable. For example, when describing a warship in the infobox, it might be more clear to write "40 x 18-pound guns, 4 x 32-pound carronades". Djmaschek (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ordnance or Ordinance?

[edit]

There are a number of references to "army ordnance" in this article. From the context, however, it seems more likely this should be "ordinance" as in a decree, rather than "ordnance" in the sense of military weapons/ammo or the services in charge of it. Perhaps the French usage is different, but if someone with more expertise on the subject could chime in it would be appreciated. Russ3Z (talk) 21:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply