Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23e4363dfabddf0

Jump to content

Talk:Brazilians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Idumea47b in topic Ethnic declarations

Original research

[edit]

This article had a lot of original research, with information without sources. Moreover, many "information" had sources, but when you open them and read them, the "information" were not in the given source. I removed them. Xuxo (talk) 18:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Composition II

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 11 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Saler2727 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Saler2727 (talk) 14:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ethnic declarations

[edit]

" For example, in the 2010 census, especially in the state of Piauí, many people who had no Oriental origin for some reason classified themselves as "Yellow" in the census. As a consequence, Piauí and other states appeared ahead of the state of São Paulo when it comes to their Yellow proportion, even though it is historically known that most Asian immigrants, mostly Japanese, settled in São Paulo"

Curious how exactly that was determined. Isn't the point of the census to determine who is actually living in a given region? Did they do a second census after the first only this time they had an independent observer note down the apparent ethnicity of the subject, and then they compared the results to the official census and determined they had given a different answer previously? Did they do a poll on the people? If so why would one assume the answers were wrong in one case and not in the other? Maybe they lied on the poll and not the census. Or is it just a case where they looked at the results and said "ah, clearly that's nonsense, everyone knows most of the people of Asian heritage live in Sao Paulo, they must have lied on the census form". Doesn't that make the entire census worthless as a method to determine who actually lives in a region, if you can just look at the results and say "well that's clearly wrong, because we already know who lives there"? Did someone actually go out into the region and investigate and see whether massive numbers of Asian Brazilians hadn't relocated for some reason? Did they interview people and find large numbers who admitted to claiming to be Asian on the census even though they aren't? If so why is the reason that they made this claim still unknown? If you actually verified it was untrue you could have found out why they did it at the same time. Idumea47b (talk) 10:34, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply