Talk:Braves Field

Untitled

Very interesting piece, but methinks this page could do with a bit of redecorating... ~ Ross (ElCharismo) 19:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

• If nothing else, the dimensions chronology is virtually unreadable. It could be simplied, methinks. Wahkeenah 19:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Merger proposal?

It could be done. There should be plenty of material between the two. The question is... which one do you redirect to the other? Probably to the current structures. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 04:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Disagree. Two different types of structures for two different purposes. Best to leave separate, and avoid any confusion, esp over which name should take precedence. - BillCJ 20:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

That's not strictly true, as there was and is noticeable overlap. However, on reflection, I think they are different enough to warrant retaining the separate articles. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 20:37, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

On a side note, a merge tag should be placed on both articles and not just the Braves Field article. -Zomic13 05:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot to remove it after BBug's last comment. It's gone now. - BillCJ 07:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I should've looked at the dates of the discussion...didn't notice that this ended a month and a half ago! :P -Zomic13 09:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)