Talk:Braj
Add topic| The content of Brij Mahotsav was merged into Braj on 27 June 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]'Coments' shouldn't Vraja and Vraj redirect here? Syama (talk) 17:25, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes you can do that. Maquahuitltalk! 08:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Not Agree
[edit]Not agree to this suggessionRasoolpuri (talk) 16:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I also do not agree to merging Braj with Vrindsavan. They're not the same thing. Vrindavan is a forest within Braj. Braj has many forests. Braj also has significant essential meaning outside the meaning of Vrindavan. Good idea though. Vaisnavi (talk) 07:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)Vaisnavi 21 August 2008
Correct spelling
[edit]Correct spelling of Braj are BrijRasoolpuri (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Braj comes from 'vraja' of Sanskrit. Even though 'brij' is quite commonly used too, 'braj' is more appropriate. Maquahuitltalk! 11:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
One word
[edit]"If Bhagwat Geeta can be summarized in one word as "Nishkaam Karmayoga", Braj can be summarized in one word as "Simplification of Divine"." At least we Americans won't understand that, because "Nishkaam Karmayoga" is two words not one word, and "Simplification of Divine" is three words. 2601:8:B500:862:DFD:5496:5C9:CA47 (talk) 06:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Brij Mahotsav into Braj
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was merge Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 01:45, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Not enough sources for a standalone article. The section on History and location is not about the Mahotsav (festival, celebration) but about Bharatpur as a region. It can be deleted. The remaining paragraph fits well in Braj. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- I agree @Ruud Buitelaar. Please do the needful. Astra Travasso (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- ok. Will do when I have time in the next few days Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 05:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
No history section?
[edit]Shouldn't there be a history section covering this region? Beyond the festivals? Weren't the Jat principalities that were united by the rajas of Bharatpur State originally from this region? And the Jat revolts against Mughal rule started from here? It seems like a missed opportunity to not mention any of that. Ironborn392 (talk) 01:47, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Hinduism articles
- High-importance Hinduism articles
- C-Class Krishnaism articles
- High-importance Krishnaism articles
- C-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Rajasthan articles
- Unknown-importance Rajasthan articles
- C-Class Rajasthan articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject Rajasthan articles
- C-Class Indian geography articles
- Low-importance Indian geography articles
- C-Class Indian geography articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian geography articles
- WikiProject India articles


