Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a229b41f3dfeb86e

Jump to content

Talk:Braj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ironborn392 in topic No history section?

Untitled

[edit]

'Coments' shouldn't Vraja and Vraj redirect here? Syama (talk) 17:25, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes you can do that. Maquahuitltalk! 08:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Not Agree

[edit]

Not agree to this suggessionRasoolpuri (talk) 16:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I also do not agree to merging Braj with Vrindsavan. They're not the same thing. Vrindavan is a forest within Braj. Braj has many forests. Braj also has significant essential meaning outside the meaning of Vrindavan. Good idea though. Vaisnavi (talk) 07:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)Vaisnavi 21 August 2008Reply

Correct spelling

[edit]

Correct spelling of Braj are BrijRasoolpuri (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Braj comes from 'vraja' of Sanskrit. Even though 'brij' is quite commonly used too, 'braj' is more appropriate. Maquahuitltalk! 11:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

One word

[edit]

"If Bhagwat Geeta can be summarized in one word as "Nishkaam Karmayoga", Braj can be summarized in one word as "Simplification of Divine"." At least we Americans won't understand that, because "Nishkaam Karmayoga" is two words not one word, and "Simplification of Divine" is three words. 2601:8:B500:862:DFD:5496:5C9:CA47 (talk) 06:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Brij Mahotsav into Braj

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 01:45, 28 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Not enough sources for a standalone article. The section on History and location is not about the Mahotsav (festival, celebration) but about Bharatpur as a region. It can be deleted. The remaining paragraph fits well in Braj. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

I agree @Ruud Buitelaar. Please do the needful. Astra Travasso (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
ok. Will do when I have time in the next few days Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 05:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

No history section?

[edit]

Shouldn't there be a history section covering this region? Beyond the festivals? Weren't the Jat principalities that were united by the rajas of Bharatpur State originally from this region? And the Jat revolts against Mughal rule started from here? It seems like a missed opportunity to not mention any of that. Ironborn392 (talk) 01:47, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply