Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22d92791a111210

Jump to content

Talk:Boxer movement

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by 2605:A601:A099:5500:F45F:E236:2B8E:A6AD in topic Characterization of xenophobia

Page move from Yìhéquán to Boxers (group)

[edit]

Hello. As you may have noticed, I have moved the page from Yìhéquán to Boxers (group). This falls in-line with the page-name policies laid out in Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English). In English, the term 'boxers' to refer to the group is nearly completely universal, never have I seen an example where the pinyin is used instead in a fully English publication. If you disagree or realize that I've made some major mistake, feel free to ping me on here or send me a message to me on my talk page.

Cheers! Khu'hamgaba Kitap talk 22:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Members

[edit]

Between 3 and 100000 members? Ripousse (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Characterization of xenophobia

[edit]

@Simonm223 and @ProKMT, this seems like a conversation worth hashing out here. Cards on the table: I would personally very much characterize the Boxer movement as fundamentally xenophobic, though suffice it to say I'm not totally morally appalled about that, given the context.

While pointing to their slogan alone certainly doesn't suffice, I think a broad reading of expressed Boxer ideology and praxis bears this out. But I'm curious to hear what others think.Remsense 23:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's the removal of the anti-imperialism tag that bothers me. Simonm223 (talk) 23:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Aye—if I understand correctly this echoes the old chestnut of "you wouldn't characterize the Seven Years' War as France falling victim to imperialism, so why do so with the Mughals or the Qing?" The Boxers can't be anti-imperialist because they were fierce proponents of an empire, in other words.
I don't find this argument persuasive, though I'm not sure I'm steelmanning it here, so I'm happy to be corrected. Remsense 23:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
To see the words: Destroy the foreigner appear next to a catalogue of wiki's leftist belief systems is too good. 1 updoot to keep that going. 2605:A601:A099:5500:F45F:E236:2B8E:A6AD (talk) 09:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Here the construct of "left good right bad" appears under the guise of "a wiki series", whatever TF that is. like "over here you can learn more about Nelson Mandela, Gaddafi, or Hamas..Just in case youre interested in reading all that for whatever reasons" 2605:A601:A099:5500:F45F:E236:2B8E:A6AD (talk) 09:31, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply