Talk:Boundedly generated group
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Automata
[edit]User:arcfrk: The reason Olshanskii was not mentioned is that the Grigorchuk example, while not having bounded exponent, is completely elementary and can be fully explained with proofs on one page. This is not true of Olshanskii's work (as far as I know) which solves a much harder and deeper problem. Is there a very short and simple example due to Olshanskii? Note that the editors of periodic groups omit Olshanskii. Please carry on any dialogue about the article here, not in hidden comments in the article itself. Mathsci (talk) 11:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Symmetric groups
[edit]What is e? It's not defined, and its meaning is unclear from context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.111.243.254 (talk) 14:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Clarified. Joel Brennan (talk) 19:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Log used in symmetric groups
[edit]In the "Symmetric groups" section, is that natural logarithm? Logarithm says the "log x" notation is ambiguous as to the base. -- Beland (talk) 00:14, 23 December 2025 (UTC)