Talk:Bouffant

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Perhaps we could reference the Bulbous Bouffant comedy sketch? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.116.101 (talk) 13:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

not 16th century 17 th century

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

it was a popular hairstyle in the 17th century not int he 16th. look at the article in "reclams mode und kostuemlexikon by ingrid loschek 4. revidierte und erweiterte auflage page 132" in which the years 1630 to 1650 are mentioned -212.186.100.35 19:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Etymology: why should it be derived from the female form? Spelling indicates otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.74.208.163 (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Bouffant

not 16th century 17 th century