Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23086804ff290ce

Jump to content

Talk:Botanical Latin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Sminthopsis84 in topic Pronunciation

Pronunciation

[edit]

I took the liberty of adding IPA pronunciations to the table.

What is like aw in awl (diphthong) supposed to describe? First, awl is a rather obscure word, and according to wikt:awl it's pronounced /ɔːl/ (rhymes with call). I'd say that Latin au is supposed to sound similar to (h)our /ˈaʊə/, just with a syllable split, i.e. /a.ʊ/. Not sure how to formulate an English pronunciation for that, but awl is probably very wrong. No such user (talk) 12:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. (I won't try to check the IPA, that's "all Greek to me".) Stearn says that the pronunciation of "au" differs between the "reformed" or "restored" academic pronunciation adopted by classical scholars, and "traditional English" pronunciation. For the Classical, he has "au as in house". For the traditional English, "aw as in bawl". I've moved the diphthong/not annotation to the column with the Latin, to perhaps clarify. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)Reply