Talk:Bornless Ritual
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.png){kind=small}
Bornless vs. Headless
[edit]Parts of the article, in particular the history and background, seem to be sloppy about using Bornless in place of Headless at times... Mastakos (talk) 05:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Probable AI usage
[edit]Concerns were raised previously via tag about AI-generated content in this article, which is prohibited per WP:NOLLM. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information for why this is tagged; however, note that fixing the issue requires more than just changing the superficial signs.
This pertains to the edits by Skyerise, who has made many AI edits after 2022, some disclosed Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:31, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
Presumably the authors of this article are joking?
[edit]It would be hard to imagine a more un-encyclopedic tone than that of this piece of fan-boy-ism. The article throughout resumes that the ritual is a powerful piece of spiritual technology that works, despite the utter lack of the tiniest shred of evidence that this is true. I am familiar with what happens when "outsiders" edit cult-fave articles- rapid reversions, charges of vandalism, and a ban from editing. So i won't try to fix this, but someone sure needs to do so. If you cut out every uncited statement, every statement not supported by the offered citation, and every instance of sugary praise vocabulary from this article, you will have 2-3 sentences left. ~2026-22759-96 (talk) 23:05, 6 July 2026 (UTC)