Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2324e826bc61cc4

Jump to content

Talk:Born Fighting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 2.51.43.8 in topic NPOV

This book has positive and negative reviews. Selection of reviews should reflect as much as possible a NPOV. It was the basis for a two-part Smithsonian program.

NPOV

[edit]

Anonymous user inserting reviews linked to unpublished essay.Kmccook (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


That is a lie. At the opening of the essay, it reads: Originally published in History Scotland 6.5 (Sept/Oct 2006). 2.51.43.8 (talk) 15:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

It is not bad faith or a lie. There was a link to an academia page which is a self-edited page. Put ina source to the original published article. The anonymous editor seems anxious to use the word "deplorable" in connection with the book.

It was originally published in a publication: History Scotland, which was then uploaded online. What is the issue with the sourcing? If you want, you can always add credible reviews praising Jim Webb's views, albeit if the historian's review is anthing to go by, it's extremely lacking in value. 2.51.43.8 (talk) 15:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply